Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(rhino): ensure more robust expiration checks in rhino #311

Conversation

didimitrie
Copy link
Member

see linear ticket on the why

Copy link

linear bot commented Oct 18, 2024

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 18, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 8.40%. Comparing base (b2eb5ef) to head (2724b03).
Report is 3 commits behind head on dev.

Additional details and impacted files
@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##             dev    #311   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage   8.40%   8.40%           
=====================================
  Files        240     240           
  Lines       4816    4816           
  Branches     556     556           
=====================================
  Hits         405     405           
  Misses      4394    4394           
  Partials      17      17           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@didimitrie didimitrie merged commit ecf508c into dev Oct 18, 2024
5 checks passed
@didimitrie didimitrie deleted the dimitrie/cnx-659-rhino-expiration-checks-might-not-run-given-inconsistent-doc branch October 18, 2024 15:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants