Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update CockyBoys.yml #2037

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 22, 2024
Merged

Update CockyBoys.yml #2037

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 22, 2024

Conversation

gimmeliina
Copy link
Contributor

Get higher quality thumbnail from comments.

Get higher quality thumbnail from comments.
@feederbox826
Copy link
Collaborator

The thumbnail quality doesnt seem to improve, it looks like it's just a bicubic upscaled version of the 1x picture, with 4x being upscaled to 4x with no actual fidelity improvement. I'd rather keep the low-res one that isn't stretched up, unless you have found scenes with actual quality improvements

@gimmeliina
Copy link
Contributor Author

gimmeliina commented Sep 21, 2024

The thumbnail quality doesnt seem to improve, it looks like it's just a bicubic upscaled version of the 1x picture, with 4x being upscaled to 4x with no actual fidelity improvement. I'd rather keep the low-res one that isn't stretched up, unless you have found scenes with actual quality improvements

Old Scraper doesn't use even 1x image but special low-res thumbnail that is awful quality.

If you checked first scene on the page, (a secret place), those are series and exceptions and for those scenes this scraper return low quality scaled version.

You can compare quality old vs this version in stashdb:
New:
https://stashdb.org/scenes/9ba56452-c135-4006-8fac-3b8687ea78f2
https://stashdb.org/scenes/282b1ed7-7b7f-4a10-a86a-7da657ff0df9

Old:
https://stashdb.org/scenes/35441381-4cf6-4153-b1ae-3aafdf375d1a
https://stashdb.org/scenes/a87243bf-96f8-47b2-a385-22291f9a3137

(Edit; added link; edit; fixed links)

@feederbox826
Copy link
Collaborator

I find 2x to be indiscernable from 4x, I guess I did stumble on the exceptions. Since StashDB rescales anyways, I see no harm in 4x once they come up with proper highres

@feederbox826 feederbox826 merged commit f7f98fe into stashapp:master Sep 22, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants