Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: jazzy support #306

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

miyakoshi-dev
Copy link
Contributor

@miyakoshi-dev miyakoshi-dev commented Oct 25, 2024

Description

jazzy support

Related links

https://tier4.atlassian.net/browse/RT2-1803

Notes for reviewers

Pre-review checklist for the PR author

In-review checklist for the PR reviewers

The PR reviewers must check the checkboxes below before approval.

  • The PR has been properly tested.
  • The PR has been reviewed.

Post-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below before merging.

  • There are no open discussions or they are tracked via tickets.
  • The PR is ready for merge.

After all checkboxes are checked, anyone who has write access can merge the PR.

@miyakoshi-dev miyakoshi-dev changed the title jazzy support feat: jazzy support Oct 25, 2024
CARET_trace/src/ros_trace_points.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CARET_trace/include/caret_trace/tp.h Show resolved Hide resolved
CARET_trace/src/hooked_trace_points.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CARET_trace/src/hooked_trace_points.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CARET_trace/src/hooked_trace_points.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CARET_trace/include/caret_trace/data_container.hpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CARET_trace/include/caret_trace/data_container.hpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
return;
}

if (trace_filter_is_rcl_publish_recorded) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The following is one of the suggestions for implementation improvement.
I don't think it's necessary to include this in the current PR, but I'll leave it as text for reference.


Until now, we've been determining whether to apply the filter for rmw_publish (=dds_write) based on the presence or absence of rcl_publish records.
However, from jazzy onwards, we can obtain rmw_publish.
Using rmw_publish for filtering might enable a more appropriate implementation.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

no particular corrections made to this issue

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants