Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix: #[trace] async fn a(mut b) #119

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

taqtiqa-mark
Copy link
Contributor

Close issue #112.
Per the comment of @andylokandy this appears to be a residual
carried over from the async-trait crate code.

Signed-off-by: Mark Van de Vyver [email protected]

Close issue tikv#112.
Per the comment of @andylokandy this appears to be a residual
carried over from the async-trait crate code.

Signed-off-by: Mark Van de Vyver <[email protected]>
@andylokandy
Copy link
Collaborator

I suspect L259-L276 can all be removed.

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 2010728323

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • 1 unchanged line in 1 file lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.007%) to 87.278%

Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
minitrace-macro/src/lib.rs 1 66.05%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 1955513276: -0.007%
Covered Lines: 1571
Relevant Lines: 1800

💛 - Coveralls

@taqtiqa-mark
Copy link
Contributor Author

taqtiqa-mark commented Mar 21, 2022

I suspect L259-L276 can all be removed.

Possibly, I'll need to understand the test cases a bit better before feeling comfortable making that kind of change.

Update: So that this PR is not blocked from landing, I've added issue #121 to track this suggestion/observation

@taqtiqa-mark
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is closed in PR #127

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants