Correct succeed-on-non-exist option in docs #319
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Docs refer to option as `succeed-on-non-exist` but code expects `succeed-on-non-existent` Signed-off-by: Mark Matyas <[email protected]>
|
Thank you! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
Correct the docs. I tried using the
succeed-on-non-existoption but it wasn't working as expected. Upon looking at the code I realized the docs were incorrect.Proposed Changes
Docs refer to option as
succeed-on-non-existbut code expectssucceed-on-non-existentTest Plan
succeed-on-non-existentactually works wheresucceed-on-non-existdoes nothing.