fix(Todoist): Project with sections to get project name

[tomcat0090]

Projects with segments cannot get the project name.

As a side note, if the project name is not registered in Toggl and the segment name matches the project name in Toggl, it will be recognized as the project name.
This commit is for the list only, and the task detail screen will be fixed separately.

Please remember the Contributing Guidelines ❤️

🌟 What does this PR do?

Resolves some of the problems caused by the addition of sections to Todoist.

For the toggle buttons in the following views, the process of obtaining the project name has been corrected.

• Today
• Upcoming
• Filters & Labels

This will resolve the following Issue.

Issue with applying projects for tasks within a project segment in Todoist #2141
Projects not recognized in Today/Upcoming view if task is part of a section #1930

🐛 Recommendations for testing

All changes should be tested across Chrome and Firefox. -> Done

📝 Links to relevant issues or information

Fixes #2141 #1930

[glensc]

Suggested change

	function isExist(str, arr) {
	function contains(str, arr) {

Better naming. and should swap arguments too: contains(arr, str)

or use native Array.includes:

• https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Array/includes

[glensc]

add to PR title the name of what integration you are fixing

[tomcat0090]

Thanks for the review @glensc.

The title has been changed to correct the areas that were pointed out.
This pull request solves the problem of incorrectly retrieving the project name depending on the section.
It also includes the ability to determine that the section name in Todoist is the project name in Toggl. (Of course, the Todoist project name takes precedence.)
Please review again.
If there is any problem, please point it out again.

[glensc]

@tomcat0090 what i had in mind that you include integration name in title, this project (toggl/track-extension) includes many integrations not just integration to "todoist"

[tomcat0090]

@glensc
I see!
fix it.

[tomcat0090]

Are there other problems?
@glensc