Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add the TEMPO microphysics submodule #215

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: ufs/dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

AndersJensen-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator

Development of the Thompson-Eidhammer microphysics is transitioning to a submodule, and this submodule is: https://github.com/NCAR/TEMPO

TEMPO stand for Thompson-Eidhammer Microphysics Parameterization for Operations.

The use of a submodule will enable centralized community development (and testing) of the microphysics scheme for various applications and dynamical cores. This submodule will eventually replace the Thompson parameterization currently in the CCPP after approval from all parties involved and significant testing.

This implementation is done in a way that will allow parallel testing of both TEMPO and the original Thompson microphysics.

@grantfirl
Copy link
Collaborator

@AndersJensen-NOAA How does this relate to #214? I see that it does everything this does plus some other changes.

@AndersJensen-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@AndersJensen-NOAA How does this relate to #214? I see that it does everything this does plus some other changes.

@grantfirl This PR implements TEMPO in parallel to Thompson so they can be tested side-side-side. #214 is an implementation that would replace Thompson. @dustinswales and I decided to do a parallel implementation first.

@grantfirl
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @AndersJensen-NOAA, sorry for letting this fester here for a while. Now that our software release is out-the-door, we're trying to catch up on code management tasks. We're trying to prioritize our reviews since there are a few heavy ones. Is this work of particular urgency to get into the UFS merge queue?

@AndersJensen-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hi @AndersJensen-NOAA, sorry for letting this fester here for a while. Now that our software release is out-the-door, we're trying to catch up on code management tasks. We're trying to prioritize our reviews since there are a few heavy ones. Is this work of particular urgency to get into the UFS merge queue?

@grantfirl No worries. We'll need to involve @dustinswales since he has started the process of benchmarking TEMPO versus Thompson. Going forward, the plan is to develop this version of the microphysics with EMC and others and replace Thompson, so the sooner it is in the official repository, the better.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants