Update most viewed cases styling

- 🌎 The cases page is getting a makeover - ⛔ The most viewed cases has not been styled yet - ✅ This commit styles it according to mocks - 🔮 Future commits will style the remaining page content
usdoj-crt · Nov 18, 2024 · 6f250b4 · 6f250b4
1 parent 21dea60
commit 6f250b4
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 3 changed files with 64 additions and 8 deletions.
diff --git a/_pages/cases.md b/_pages/cases.md
@@ -33,10 +33,10 @@ lead: |-
 
 </section>
 
-## Additional Topics
-
 <section class="manylinks">
 
+## Additional Topics
+
 - [Child care / camp](https://www.justice.gov/crt/disability-rights-cases?search_api_fulltext=%22child+care%22+or+%22camp%22&sort_by=field_date)
 - [Education](https://www.justice.gov/crt/disability-rights-cases?search_api_fulltext=education&sort_by=field_date)
 - [Effective communication](https://www.justice.gov/crt/disability-rights-cases?search_api_fulltext=%22effective+communication%22&sort_by=field_date)
@@ -57,12 +57,12 @@ lead: |-
 
 ## Most Viewed Cases
 
-- [In Re Georgia Senate Bill 202](https://www.justice.gov/crt/case/re-georgia-senate-bill-202) On January 31, 2024, the Justice Department filed a statement of interest explaining how the ADA's equal opportunity and reasonable modification requirements apply in the voting context. The statement of interest was filed in In Re Georgia SB 202, a consolidated lawsuit challenging restrictions on absentee and in-person voting under Georgia Senate Bill SB 202 (“SB 202”). One of the private lawsuits alleges that SB 202 fails to provide people with disabilities an equal opportunity to vote absentee and in-person or make reasonable modifications to avoid disability-based discrimination, in violation of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. The department’s brief explains that, under the ADA, voters with disabilities must have an equal opportunity to vote by a particular method as do voters without disabilities, and that this equal opportunity requirement is separate from the requirement that public entities make reasonable modifications. [Learn More](https://www.justice.gov/crt/case/re-georgia-senate-bill-202)
-- [Dear Colleague Letter on Online Accessibility at Postsecondary Institutions](https://www.justice.gov/crt/case/dear-colleague-letter-online-accessibility-postsecondary-institutions) On May 19, 2023, the Justice Department and the Department of Education jointly issued a Dear Colleague Letter reminding colleges, universities, and other postsecondary institutions to ensure that their online services, programs, and activities are accessible to people with disabilities. Many colleges, universities, and other postsecondary institutions increasingly rely on their websites and third-party online platforms to provide services, programs, and activities to members of the public. This includes courses on learning platforms as well as podcasts and videos on social media and third-party platforms like YouTube, Spotify, and Apple Podcasts. This joint letter reiterates that Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act require colleges, universities, and other postsecondary institutions to provide equal opportunities to people with disabilities in all their operations. The letter also highlights recent web accessibility enforcement activities and technical assistance from the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division and the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights. [Learn More](https://www.justice.gov/crt/case/dear-colleague-letter-online-accessibility-postsecondary-institutions)
-- [United States v. Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania](https://www.justice.gov/crt/case/united-states-v-unified-judicial-system-pennsylvania) On January 31, 2024, the Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania (UJS) agreed to pay $100,000 and to encourage all its component courts to adopt new policies to ensure that individuals under Pennsylvania state court supervision can take lawfully prescribed medications to treat opioid use disorder (OUD). The settlement agreement resolved the Justice Department's lawsuit against the UJS, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, and the Blair, Jefferson, Lackawanna and Northumberland County Courts of Common Pleas. [Learn More](https://www.justice.gov/crt/case/united-states-v-unified-judicial-system-pennsylvania)
-- [U.S. v. Barnet Dulaney Perkins Eye Center, PC](https://www.justice.gov/crt/case/us-v-barnet-dulaney-perkins-eye-center-pc) On December 20, 2021, the United States sued Barnet Dulaney Perkins Eye Center, PC (BDP), an optometry and ophthalmology provider with 24 facilities, for violating Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act by refusing to transfer certain patients with disabilities from wheelchairs onto surgical and exam tables and instead requiring these patients to hire third-party medical support personnel to transport them to and from BDP facilities and to provide transfer assistance at the facilities. [Learn More](https://www.justice.gov/crt/case/us-v-barnet-dulaney-perkins-eye-center-pc)
-- [Utah Department of Corrections](https://www.justice.gov/crt/case/utah-department-corrections) On March 12, 2024, the Justice Department issued a letter notifying UDOC that it violated the ADA by discriminating against an incarcerated transgender woman on the basis of her disability, gender dysphoria. The letter outlined the minimum remedial measures UDOC must take to address the violations identified and invited UDOC to work with the United States to reach an appropriate resolution. [Learn More](https://www.justice.gov/crt/case/utah-department-corrections)
-- [U.S. v. MedStar Health, Inc.](https://www.justice.gov/crt/case/us-v-medstar-health-inc) On January 30, 2024, the United States filed a Complaint against MedStar Health, Inc., a leading healthcare provider in Maryland and the greater Washington, D.C., region. The lawsuit, filed under Title III of the ADA, alleges that MedStar Health denied people with disabilities equal access to medical care by excluding their necessary support persons. The suit alleges that MedStar Health failed to modify visitor restrictions so that people with certain disabilities, which affected their ability to independently access medical care, could be accompanied by their support persons (such as a family member, companion, or aide). These included individuals with dementia, intellectual disabilities, or autism spectrum disorder whose disabilities prevented them from providing medical history or understanding medical directions. As a result, they were unable to receive equal care without the assistance of their support person. [Learn More](https://www.justice.gov/crt/case/us-v-medstar-health-inc)
+- [In Re Georgia Senate Bill 202](https://www.justice.gov/crt/case/re-georgia-senate-bill-202) On January 31, 2024, the Justice Department filed a statement of interest explaining how the ADA's equal opportunity and reasonable modification requirements apply in the voting context. The statement of interest was filed in In Re Georgia SB 202, a consolidated lawsuit challenging restrictions on absentee and in-person voting under Georgia Senate Bill SB 202 (“SB 202”). One of the private lawsuits alleges that SB 202 fails to provide people with disabilities an equal opportunity to vote absentee and in-person or make reasonable modifications to avoid disability-based discrimination, in violation of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. The department’s brief explains that, under the ADA, voters with disabilities must have an equal opportunity to vote by a particular method as do voters without disabilities, and that this equal opportunity requirement is separate from the requirement that public entities make reasonable modifications. [Learn more](https://www.justice.gov/crt/case/re-georgia-senate-bill-202)
+- [Dear Colleague Letter on Online Accessibility at Postsecondary Institutions](https://www.justice.gov/crt/case/dear-colleague-letter-online-accessibility-postsecondary-institutions) On May 19, 2023, the Justice Department and the Department of Education jointly issued a Dear Colleague Letter reminding colleges, universities, and other postsecondary institutions to ensure that their online services, programs, and activities are accessible to people with disabilities. Many colleges, universities, and other postsecondary institutions increasingly rely on their websites and third-party online platforms to provide services, programs, and activities to members of the public. This includes courses on learning platforms as well as podcasts and videos on social media and third-party platforms like YouTube, Spotify, and Apple Podcasts. This joint letter reiterates that Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act require colleges, universities, and other postsecondary institutions to provide equal opportunities to people with disabilities in all their operations. The letter also highlights recent web accessibility enforcement activities and technical assistance from the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division and the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights. [Learn more](https://www.justice.gov/crt/case/dear-colleague-letter-online-accessibility-postsecondary-institutions)
+- [United States v. Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania](https://www.justice.gov/crt/case/united-states-v-unified-judicial-system-pennsylvania) On January 31, 2024, the Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania (UJS) agreed to pay $100,000 and to encourage all its component courts to adopt new policies to ensure that individuals under Pennsylvania state court supervision can take lawfully prescribed medications to treat opioid use disorder (OUD). The settlement agreement resolved the Justice Department's lawsuit against the UJS, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, and the Blair, Jefferson, Lackawanna and Northumberland County Courts of Common Pleas. [Learn more](https://www.justice.gov/crt/case/united-states-v-unified-judicial-system-pennsylvania)
+- [U.S. v. Barnet Dulaney Perkins Eye Center, PC](https://www.justice.gov/crt/case/us-v-barnet-dulaney-perkins-eye-center-pc) On December 20, 2021, the United States sued Barnet Dulaney Perkins Eye Center, PC (BDP), an optometry and ophthalmology provider with 24 facilities, for violating Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act by refusing to transfer certain patients with disabilities from wheelchairs onto surgical and exam tables and instead requiring these patients to hire third-party medical support personnel to transport them to and from BDP facilities and to provide transfer assistance at the facilities. [Learn more](https://www.justice.gov/crt/case/us-v-barnet-dulaney-perkins-eye-center-pc)
+- [Utah Department of Corrections](https://www.justice.gov/crt/case/utah-department-corrections) On March 12, 2024, the Justice Department issued a letter notifying UDOC that it violated the ADA by discriminating against an incarcerated transgender woman on the basis of her disability, gender dysphoria. The letter outlined the minimum remedial measures UDOC must take to address the violations identified and invited UDOC to work with the United States to reach an appropriate resolution. [Learn more](https://www.justice.gov/crt/case/utah-department-corrections)
+- [U.S. v. MedStar Health, Inc.](https://www.justice.gov/crt/case/us-v-medstar-health-inc) On January 30, 2024, the United States filed a Complaint against MedStar Health, Inc., a leading healthcare provider in Maryland and the greater Washington, D.C., region. The lawsuit, filed under Title III of the ADA, alleges that MedStar Health denied people with disabilities equal access to medical care by excluding their necessary support persons. The suit alleges that MedStar Health failed to modify visitor restrictions so that people with certain disabilities, which affected their ability to independently access medical care, could be accompanied by their support persons (such as a family member, companion, or aide). These included individuals with dementia, intellectual disabilities, or autism spectrum disorder whose disabilities prevented them from providing medical history or understanding medical directions. As a result, they were unable to receive equal care without the assistance of their support person. [Learn more](https://www.justice.gov/crt/case/us-v-medstar-health-inc)
 
 <a href="https://www.justice.gov/crt/disability-rights-cases" class="view-all-button">View all cases</a>
 

diff --git a/assets/images/folder-circle.svg b/assets/images/folder-circle.svg
diff --git a/assets/sass/custom/_buttons.scss b/assets/sass/custom/_buttons.scss
@@ -152,3 +152,54 @@ span.usa-sr-only {
     }
   }
 }
+
+.descriptionlinks {
+  ul {
+    display: grid;
+    @include at-media(mobile) {
+      grid-template-columns: auto;
+    }
+    @include at-media(tablet) {
+      grid-template-columns: auto auto;
+    }
+    @include at-media(desktop) {
+      grid-template-columns: auto auto auto;
+    }
+    column-gap: 3em;
+    list-style: none;
+    padding: 0;
+
+    li {
+      margin-bottom: 3em;
+      background: url("../images/folder-circle.svg") left top no-repeat;
+      padding-left: calc(32px + 1em);
+
+      a:first-child {
+        display: block;
+        font-size: 18px;
+        margin-bottom: 1em;
+      }
+
+      a:last-child {
+        display:block;
+        font-weight: bold;
+        color: #162e51;
+        margin-top: 1em;
+      }
+    }
+  }
+}
+
+.view-all-button, .view-all-button:visited, .view-all-button:hover {
+  width: fit-content;
+  background-color: white;
+  color: #005EA2;
+  border: 2px solid #005EA2;
+  font-weight: bold;
+  padding: 0.75em 2em;
+  text-decoration: none;
+  display: block;
+  margin-top: 1em;
+  margin-left: auto;
+  margin-right: auto;
+}