Update principle on HTTP usage #487
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The existing one is dated. Most of that advice is now in RFC 9205. There is also more general advice in that document, so the guidance here gets more complex as a result.
annevk
reviewed
Apr 4, 2024
|
That's included by reference. See https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9205#section-4.7 I don't want to duplicate that advice here. |
|
I wouldn't mind redundancy on that particular requirement as for pretty much every new header that's come up in the last couple years folks had to be reminded, but okay. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The existing one is dated. Most of that advice is now in RFC 9205.
There is also more general advice in that document, so the guidance here gets more complex as a result.
Preview | Diff