Concentrate on use cases #26
Conversation
Not solutions. We don't need to over-index on the solution part, particularly when we have just one solution that is really purpose-limited in the way we describe. I like CHIPS, but it is not an API that does purpose limitation.
|
I don't hate it, and if others agree I am happy to move it in this way. However, I think it's stronger to list some concrete examples of technologies that the TAG has reviewed positively (or which have positive consensus on) that are replacing functionality currently serviced by 3rd party cookies. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This seems like a net improvement to me, though I was skeptical of the idea of this change before seeing this PR. This text is actually stronger than the original, short list of examples, because it identifies a broader set of use cases that warrant investigation.
|
Coming to this late (thanks @torgo for the reminder of this PR, and to @martinthomson for the wording). I also think this is an improvement, and would be happy for it to be merged immediately. I also think that expanding it to a bulleted list of use cases, with links to existing or proposed solutions, and noting their level of maturity/adoption, would be a good thing to follow up with soon. |
torgo
changed the title
torgo
changed the title
|
Ref #30. |
Not solutions. We don't need to over-index on the solution part, particularly when we have just one solution that is really purpose-limited in the way we describe.
I like CHIPS, but it is not an API that does purpose limitation.