This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 7, 2022. It is now read-only.
Improve security of polkadot.service #99
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This additional config is based on the output of `systemd-analyze security polkadot.service`. We recently added [our own](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/blob/master/scripts/packaging/polkadot.service) polkadot.service file in the polkadot repo and spent a little time researching which sandboxing and namespacing options we could take advantage of. Discussion for that PR is [here](paritytech/polkadot#1676 (comment)).
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This additional config is based on the output of
systemd-analyze security polkadot.service. We recently added our own polkadot.service file in the polkadot repo and spent a little time researching which sandboxing and namespacing options we could take advantage of. Discussion for that PR is here.