Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: use bitcoind version 28.0 #1398

Draft
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jp1ac4
Copy link
Collaborator

@jp1ac4 jp1ac4 commented Oct 25, 2024

This resolves #1397.

@jp1ac4 jp1ac4 marked this pull request as draft October 25, 2024 19:10
@nondiremanuel nondiremanuel added the Nice to have If it's not completed in time for the current version, it can be postponed label Oct 28, 2024
@jp1ac4
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jp1ac4 commented Oct 28, 2024

I'm able to reproduce the failing tests locally. It seems that electrs v0.9.11 doesn't work with bitcoind v28.0, but more recent electrs versions do. I'll need to make a more recent electrs binary available and then use this in the CI.

@jp1ac4
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jp1ac4 commented Oct 28, 2024

I've created RCasatta/electrsd#86 to build a more recent electrs binary.

@jp1ac4 jp1ac4 force-pushed the ci-use-bitcoind-28.0 branch from 1bebadc to 9c30b31 Compare November 22, 2024 17:00
@jp1ac4
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jp1ac4 commented Nov 22, 2024

Error in logs:

./electrs: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.38' not found (required by ./electrs)

Perhaps an update to the Docker image is required.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Nice to have If it's not completed in time for the current version, it can be postponed
Projects
Status: In Progress
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ci: use latest bitcoind version
2 participants