Movement with Boundary Conditions #43
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…nto seperate namespace
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Clearer distinction of where doubly periodic boundary conditions for cartesian domain are used
New "apply_domain_boundary_conditions" function call in MoveSupersInDomain allows option to add extra boundary condtitions
change to SDMMethods constructor to take MoveSupersInDomain as argument instead of Motion.
minor change to initial conditions generation in create_[x].py python scripts
minor bug fixes to mass moments in sdmout python module
movement of functions from main.cpp into an "implementation" .hpp file