You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello, as a new learner of methylpy I am curious about how to acquire mapping efficiency, since it seems not shown in the output result in total. I used to use bismark, and the mapping efficiency is about 40-60%, which is quite low when compared with other plant species. I have looked through bowtie2 report but it seems different from this.
Therefore i try to replace it this methylpy.
my code is as follows: methylpy paired-end-pipeline --read1-files ../samplename_clean.1.fq.gz --read2-files ../samplename_clean.2.fq.gz --sample samplename --forward-ref ../methypy_ref/genome_f --reverse-ref ../methypy_ref/genome_r --ref-fasta ../fasta --num-procs 20 --trim-reads False --compress-output True --remove-clonal True --path-to-picard /direction_to_picard/software/
my result report is as follows:
Begin splitting reads for libA
Mon Feb 13 00:52:04 2023
No trimming applied on reads
Mon Feb 13 01:08:03 2023
Begin converting reads for libA
Mon Feb 13 01:08:03 2023
Begin Running Bowtie2 for libA
Mon Feb 13 01:09:03 2023
109022310 reads; of these:
109022310 (100.00%) were paired; of these:
52732411 (48.37%) aligned concordantly 0 times
30919854 (28.36%) aligned concordantly exactly 1 time
25370045 (23.27%) aligned concordantly >1 times
51.63% overall alignment rate
Processing forward strand hits
Mon Feb 13 02:53:36 2023
109022310 reads; of these:
109022310 (100.00%) were paired; of these:
52872328 (48.50%) aligned concordantly 0 times
30919684 (28.36%) aligned concordantly exactly 1 time
25230298 (23.14%) aligned concordantly >1 times
51.50% overall alignment rate
Processing reverse strand hits
Mon Feb 13 04:42:43 2023
Bismark result is as follows:
Final Alignment report
======================
Sequence pairs analysed in total: 109022310
Number of paired-end alignments with a unique best hit: 50998056
Mapping efficiency: 46.8%
Sequence pairs with no alignments under any condition: 46756311
Sequence pairs did not map uniquely: 11267943
Sequence pairs which were discarded because genomic sequence could not be extracted: 101
Number of sequence pairs with unique best (first) alignment came from the bowtie output:
CT/GA/CT: 25516794 ((converted) top strand)
GA/CT/CT: 0 (complementary to (converted) top strand)
GA/CT/GA: 0 (complementary to (converted) bottom strand)
CT/GA/GA: 25481161 ((converted) bottom strand)
Number of alignments to (merely theoretical) complementary strands being rejected in total: 0
Thank you and looking forward to the anawer.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There are 93996 total input reads
Mon May 3 22:15:54 2021
There are 88982 uniquely mapping reads, 94.6657304566 percent remaining
Mon May 3 22:15:54 2021
Thank you so much for your answer. May i ask is there any way to output these information to a certain file like Bismark. For I have many sample to analyze, and currently these information were output to one file named nohup.out. Will > sample.name.txt after each line of code works?
Hello, as a new learner of methylpy I am curious about how to acquire mapping efficiency, since it seems not shown in the output result in total. I used to use bismark, and the mapping efficiency is about 40-60%, which is quite low when compared with other plant species. I have looked through bowtie2 report but it seems different from this.
Therefore i try to replace it this methylpy.
my code is as follows:
methylpy paired-end-pipeline --read1-files ../samplename_clean.1.fq.gz --read2-files ../samplename_clean.2.fq.gz --sample samplename --forward-ref ../methypy_ref/genome_f --reverse-ref ../methypy_ref/genome_r --ref-fasta ../fasta --num-procs 20 --trim-reads False --compress-output True --remove-clonal True --path-to-picard /direction_to_picard/software/
my result report is as follows:
Bismark result is as follows:
Thank you and looking forward to the anawer.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: