Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AP_OSD: use internal enumeration in place of mavlink enumeration #26269

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 20, 2024

Conversation

peterbarker
Copy link
Contributor

this will let us more-easily compile without the mavlink headers

Board                    AP_Periph  blimp  bootloader  copter  heli  iofirmware  plane  rover  sub
CubeOrange-periph-heavy  *                                                                     
Durandal                            *      *           0       0                 0      0      *
Hitec-Airspeed           *                                                                     
KakuteH7-bdshot                     *      *           0       0                 0      0      *
MatekF405                           *      *           0       0                 0      0      *
Pixhawk1-1M-bdshot                  *                  *       *                 *      *      *
f103-QiotekPeriph        *                                                                     
f303-Universal           *                                                                     
iomcu                                                                *                         
revo-mini                           *      *           0       0                 0      0      *
skyviper-v2450                                         *                                       

this will let us more-easily compile without the mavlink headers
@peterbarker peterbarker merged commit d5e4d19 into ArduPilot:master Feb 20, 2024
92 checks passed
@peterbarker peterbarker deleted the pr/osd-enumeration branch February 21, 2024 08:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants