-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pix flaming f767 to copter 4.4 #26352
Pix flaming f767 to copter 4.4 #26352
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Rhys Mainwaring <[email protected]>
Two structs with the same name must have exactly the same definition, no matter where they occur in the program, otherwise the program is undefined. Move each sample register struct definition into the associated class definition so they are in a different namespace and no longer identically named, thus fixing this issue.
narrower define we can use when not compiling in the backends which use this
…NABLED narrower define we can use when not compiling in the backends which use this
calculate D feed-forward and notch applications correctly only update notches when enabled add notches and D feedforward to heli PIDs add advanced flag an selectively compile advanced options
add advanced flag to PIDs and selectively compile advanced PID options
update PID notch centers at 1Hz with average loop rate
update PID notch centers at 1Hz with average loop rate
* Implement filter state without relying on GPS * Implement health and initialization check based on filter state * Fix pre-arm checks missing version * Add version specifics to microstrain 5 log msgs * Add utilities to microstrain packet to remove magic number array access Signed-off-by: Ryan Friedman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Friedman <[email protected]>
* The old descriptor is deprecated Signed-off-by: Ryan Friedman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Friedman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Friedman <[email protected]>
this one has been really bad for a while
the first option is to disable DCM fallback on fixed wing. This is suitable in environments with a high likelyhood of GPS interference
Is this a new board? It should be PR'd against the master branch first. |
Yes I have created , #25714 |
Ah, OK, sorry that one had been open for so long. I will close this so we can concentrate the discussion there. Once that one is in we can think about backports. Although at this point I don't think we would port to 4.4, 4.5 is just starting beta, so we would port to 4.5. |
Thanks peter |
No description provided.