Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add payment card #42771

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
Jun 5, 2024
Merged

Add payment card #42771

merged 17 commits into from
Jun 5, 2024

Conversation

narefyev91
Copy link
Contributor

@narefyev91 narefyev91 commented May 29, 2024

Details

Implement “Add payment card” screen (UI)
Generally build new component for rendering any kind of Adding payment card form.
Replaced form for Wallet debit card, Owner workspace debit card and Add payment card for subscription

Fixed Issues

$ #38634
PROPOSAL:

Tests

  1. Go to settings/subscription/add-payment-card
  2. Verify that user can see add debit card
  3. Click Add payment card
  4. Verify that user will see errors with required fields
  5. Fill all required fields
  6. Verify that no errors are shown
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

  1. Go to settings/subscription/add-payment-card
  2. Verify that user can see add debit card
  3. Click Add payment card
  4. Verify that user will see errors with required fields
  5. Fill all required fields
  6. Verify that no errors are shown
  7. Verify that save button is disabled

QA Steps

  1. Go to settings/subscription/add-payment-card
  2. Verify that user can see add debit card
  3. Click Add payment card
  4. Verify that user will see errors with required fields
  5. Fill all required fields
  6. Verify that no errors are shown
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari Screenshot 2024-05-31 at 11 40 23 Screenshot 2024-05-31 at 11 40 41
MacOS: Desktop Screenshot 2024-05-31 at 11 40 41 Screenshot 2024-05-31 at 11 40 23

@narefyev91 narefyev91 changed the base branch from feature-payment-card-subscription to main May 29, 2024 15:44
@narefyev91 narefyev91 marked this pull request as ready for review May 31, 2024 09:06
@narefyev91 narefyev91 requested review from a team as code owners May 31, 2024 09:06
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from dukenv0307 and removed request for a team May 31, 2024 09:06
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented May 31, 2024

@dukenv0307 Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like we have a small unneeded margin at the bottom of the view:
CleanShot 2024-05-31 at 11 08 30@2x

@narefyev91
Copy link
Contributor Author

narefyev91 commented May 31, 2024

@shawnborton hey! can i get a review for add payment card screen, please? It maybe some not correct margin between elements - without dev mode hard to check(picked the same as we had for other add debit card screen - 20px). I requested 10 times for dev mode in figma - lol

Screenshot 2024-05-31 at 11 40 41 Screenshot 2024-05-31 at 11 40 23

};

function IconSection({icon, iconContainerStyles}: IconSectionProps) {
function IconSection({icon, iconContainerStyles, width = variables.iconSection, height = variables.iconSection}: IconSectionProps) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rather than using 68x68 here, should we use 48x48 like we do for most other simple illustrations in product? cc @dannymcclain @dubielzyk-expensify for thoughts there. This way we don't need to create a new icon size variable either.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah probably this is example where 68 is using. Just let me know if we need to swap to 48x48 by default
Screenshot 2024-05-31 at 12 49 11

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, we typically use 48x48 everywhere in the product these days for this type of illustration, so we might want to be consistent here as well. Let's see what the design team thinks.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah I'm aligned using 48x48 here

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay cool, @narefyev91 can we try the icon using our standard 48x48 size please? Thanks!

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah - will update

@narefyev91
Copy link
Contributor Author

Looks like we have a small unneeded margin at the bottom of the view: CleanShot 2024-05-31 at 11 08 30@2x

well it's show because we move out from screen - and scroll appears

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

yes, but the scroll should be flush with the bottom of the view.

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

The padding/spacing looks pretty good to me, but looping in @Expensify/design for some eyes too.

@narefyev91
Copy link
Contributor Author

Looks like we have a small unneeded margin at the bottom of the view: CleanShot 2024-05-31 at 11 08 30@2x

well it's show because we move out from screen - and scroll appears

@shawnborton like here

Screen.Recording.2024-05-31.at.12.11.31.mov

@narefyev91
Copy link
Contributor Author

narefyev91 commented May 31, 2024

yes, but the scroll should be flush with the bottom of the view.

ohhh got what you are saying!
@shawnborton should be like this one?

Screen.Recording.2024-05-31.at.12.15.29.mov

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Exactly!

@narefyev91
Copy link
Contributor Author

Exactly!

yeah! cool fixed!

Screen.Recording.2024-05-31.at.12.19.14.mov

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Much better, thanks!

@trjExpensify trjExpensify requested review from rushatgabhane and removed request for dukenv0307 May 31, 2024 12:06
@trjExpensify
Copy link
Contributor

@rushatgabhane is going to review!

@dubielzyk-expensify
Copy link
Contributor

Is there some padding or something weird going on at the bottom here on the main screen with the fields?
CleanShot 2024-06-03 at 08 08 12@2x

It looks like there's some empty space there when scrolling

@narefyev91
Copy link
Contributor Author

Is there some padding or something weird going on at the bottom here on the main screen with the fields? CleanShot 2024-06-03 at 08 08 12@2x

It looks like there's some empty space there when scrolling

Yeah - it was fixed here
#42771 (comment)

@rushatgabhane
Copy link
Member

rushatgabhane commented Jun 3, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari image image
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-06-04.at.22.18.29.mov
MacOS: Desktop image

Copy link
Member

@rushatgabhane rushatgabhane left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@narefyev91 im unable to click "I accept" checkbox

Screen.Recording.2024-06-03.at.12.45.48.mov

@narefyev91
Copy link
Contributor Author

@narefyev91 im unable to click "I accept" checkbox

Screen.Recording.2024-06-03.at.12.45.48.mov

Yeah I faced the same issue when open dev menu in the bottom. Let me check - probably something from currency select is overlapping

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 3, 2024

CLA Assistant Lite bot All contributors have signed the CLA ✍️ ✅

@narefyev91
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA

@narefyev91
Copy link
Contributor Author

recheck

shouldShowPaymentCardForm={shouldShowPaymentCardForm}
addPaymentCard={addPaymentCard}
showCurrencyField
isDebitCard
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
isDebitCard

The form on this page should be the payment card, not debit card/wallet

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@amyevans are you sure?
Based on how was implemented WorkspaceOwnerPaymentCardForm - i see that it used debit card translation
Screenshot 2024-06-05 at 17 17 50

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Brought the question to Slack

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@amyevans updated

@narefyev91 narefyev91 requested a review from amyevans June 5, 2024 16:15
Copy link
Contributor

@amyevans amyevans left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great!

@amyevans amyevans merged commit 70ecf7d into Expensify:main Jun 5, 2024
16 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Jun 5, 2024

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/luacmartins in version: 1.4.81-11 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@blimpich
Copy link
Contributor

Created follow up polish issue related to this: #44051

@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ function WorkspaceOwnerChangeWrapperPage({route, policy}: WorkspaceOwnerChangeWr
Navigation.navigate(ROUTES.WORKSPACE_MEMBER_DETAILS.getRoute(policyID, accountID));
}}
/>
<View style={[styles.containerWithSpaceBetween, styles.ph5, error === CONST.POLICY.OWNERSHIP_ERRORS.NO_BILLING_CARD ? styles.pb0 : styles.pb5]}>
<View style={[styles.containerWithSpaceBetween, error !== CONST.POLICY.OWNERSHIP_ERRORS.NO_BILLING_CARD ? styles.ph5 : styles.ph0, styles.pb0]}>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Removing styles.pb5 caused the issue #44825 where the Transfer Owner's 'Continue' button was missing a bottom margin.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants