-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Supporting NextSeq and MiniSeq #65
Comments
Hi! Adding new instruments should be relatively simple. What is needed is:
I'd be happy to add support for them. What I would need from you, is if you could tell me what prefix the instruments uses, and what you think would be reasonable default qc criteria. And, since I don't have access to data from these instruments it would be great if you could run some beta testing making sure that everything seems to work (or if possible send me some data that I could try it out on). |
Hm, I have a couple of NextSeq 500 runs here that I could get hands on. |
That's great, @apeltzer. I found some information which indicated that the NextSeq instruments have serial numbers that start with SN, is that correct? If I get a pre-release out, would you be willing to beta test it? |
I guess I could do that yes - regarding the serial number, I will check. Could however very well be the case yes. |
Thats a normal FastQ file out here:
|
Thanks! Do you have any idea about what values can be used to differentiate between the High and Mid-output modes of the instrument? I'm guessing that information would be available somewhere like the |
I'm linking in Stephen here who should have access to such |
Here's some information based on our NextSeq 550 DX. The DX instrument version is certified for diagnostic use, so has a different instrument ID, e.g. NDX550213 in our case. I don't have access to medium output kit runs, but the high output ones have this in |
Sorry for the very later reply @cbrueffer , and thank you for the information. While we don't currently have the resources to implement this, we would very much welcome a PR to fix it. There is a stale PR here #69 where I stared work on this, that basically should take you through most of the changes that needs to be made. |
No worries Johan; I haven't had time to look into this further yet (hopefully soon), but for now I can at least add some more information: The mid output kit is marked as ID strings for the regular NextSeq start with |
Nice! I can add that Illumina have NextSeq and MiniSeq data in their demo data collection (requires registration to access), could perhaps serve as testdata. |
I was wondering if there is any progress in supporting NextSeq? |
Hi, what would be needed to support NextSeq and MiniSeq instruments?
Anything I can provide?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: