Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP: Adding support for NextSeq #69

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

johandahlberg
Copy link
Contributor

I've started working on added NextSeq support as in #65, still needs test, qc criterias etc, but this is at least a start.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 12, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #69 into master will increase coverage by 1%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@         Coverage Diff          @@
##           master   #69   +/-   ##
====================================
+ Coverage      92%   92%   +1%     
====================================
  Files          19    19           
  Lines         701   726   +25     
====================================
+ Hits          638   662   +24     
- Misses         63    64    +1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
checkQC/run_type_recognizer.py 93% <100%> (+1%) ⬆️
checkQC/config.py 90% <0%> (-1%) ⬇️
checkQC/exceptions.py 100% <0%> (ø)
checkQC/app.py 88% <0%> (+1%) ⬆️
checkQC/web_app.py 80% <0%> (+5%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3d2529c...aef068c. Read the comment docs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants