[SCP1]Add default value and rename constant name

[goreraks]

Refers to #396

[cla-assistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[cla-assistant]

Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
_{You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.}

[marcushoepfner]

Suggested change

	`<name>.scp1.json` | 1 | [`zif_aff_scp1_v1.intf.abap`](./type/zif_aff_scp1_v1.intf.abap) | [`scp1-v1.json`](./scp1-v1.json) | [z_aff_example_scp1.scp1.json](./examples/z_aff_example_scp1.scp1.json)
	`<name>.scp1.json` | 1 | [`zif_aff_scp1_v1.intf.abap`](./type/zif_aff_scp1_v1.intf.abap) | [`scp1-v1.json`](./scp1-v1.json) | [`z_aff_example_scp1.scp1.json`](./examples/z_aff_example_scp1.scp1.json)

[marcushoepfner]

An there too much spaces which have been added but I cannot add them to my suggestion. You may remove them manually

[goreraks]

This has to be fixed in the report because I can see that same spaces are available in the file generated from report.

[marcushoepfner]

Ok... can you please fix it anyway? Also the "`" was removed

[marcushoepfner]

An there too much spaces which have been added but I cannot add them to my suggestion. You may remove them manually

[albertmink]

@goreraks the check Validate JSON schema / validate (pull_request) is not a mandatory/required test. So in the first place, you can ignore it. For us, as the infrastructure provider, this is a meaningful test ;)

// cc. @marcushoepfner

[schneidermic0]

Thank you for the update! I have some small suggestions related to your changes.

If you adapt these, the schema needs to be generated, again.

[schneidermic0]

I think we can still change SCP1 incompatible, because there is no usage of it (e.g., in abapGit), yet.

Therefore, Looks good to me.

[marcushoepfner]

Ok... can you please fix it anyway? Also the "`" was removed

[marcushoepfner]

@schneidermic0 can you pls. double check and approve if ok?

[schneidermic0]

Looks good to me! But I want to wait merging the changes until the tests were executed

[albertmink]

Merging and overruling the checks.