-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Replace storage_v1_client with GCS client #25676
Comments
.take-issue |
Closing now that PR #25965 has been merged. |
Reopening since this got reverted in #27388 |
Running into an issue with tar.gz objects (such as staged workflow files) being implicitly decompressed when retrieved from GCS (see #12619). The way this was handled before seems to have possibly been apitools-specific. |
What is the status of this now? |
#28079 should resolve this. We're currently running some internal tests to ensure we don't break any internal users before merging again. If all goes well, that should be done by the end of this week, possibly even today. |
It sounds like this will go to next release. |
Do we have any updates on this ahead of the 2.53.0 branch cut? |
It was completed. We should just close it. |
Replace references to the apitools-generated storage client (sdks/python/apache_beam/io/gcp/internal/clients/storage) with analogous calls to the Google Cloud Storage client, supplementing with other Google Cloud Python clients if necessary.
Please ensure that all client references are being thoroughly tested before swapping the GCS client in for the old client. The job is done when the old client can be safely deleted from Beam without impacting functionality.
Background:
apitools is deprecated and continued reliance on it is complicating Beam's dependency management. In order to remove it we need to replace the clients that it currently generates with Google Cloud Python clients, which are being actively maintained (and should be reasonably up-to-date in google3, though please confirm for any particular libraries you end up using.)
Tracking issue: #19073
Issue Priority
Priority: 2 (default / most feature requests should be filed as P2)
Issue Components
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: