refactor(autoware_map_msgs): modify pcd metadata msg

[YamatoAndo]

Description

To match the structure of the Lanelet2 metadata message, I will modify the PointCloud metadata message. #81 (comment)

• add cell_id to PointCloudMapCellMetaData.msg
• delete PointCloudMapCellMetaDataWithID.msg
• rename PointCloudMapCellMetaDataWithID.msg to PointCloudMapCellWithMetaData.msg

Tests performed

Not applicable.

Effects on system behavior

Not applicable.

Pre-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below when creating the PR.

• I've confirmed the contribution guidelines.
• The PR follows the pull request guidelines.

In-review checklist for the PR reviewers

The PR reviewers must check the checkboxes below before approval.

• The PR follows the pull request guidelines.

Post-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below before merging.

• There are no open discussions or they are tracked via tickets.

After all checkboxes are checked, anyone who has write access can merge the PR.

[yukkysaito]

LGTM

[xmfcx]

@youtalk san, @mitsudome-r san, since we switched to version based repo tracking, this needs to be released and updated.

• https://github.com/autowarefoundation/autoware/actions/runs/10075917600/job/27855197516?pr=5022#step:5:13903 is failing.

• feat(lidar_apollo_segmentation_tvm)!: remove packages autoware#5022

• https://github.com/autowarefoundation/autoware/blob/3e7f3d4af81632107ab7d4c2ba2c32ba786b66ad/autoware.repos#L3-L6

I think we will need to formally do a release for every PR in these repositories with versions, is that alright?

[youtalk]

@xmfcx The core packages' version control partially prevents the API breakage which I expected.
Instead we need to release the package by semantic versioning.

@YamatoAndo Generally speaking, we should not casually break the API. Please reconsider your changes.

[xmfcx]

This was reverted by:

• revert: revert "refactor(autoware_map_msgs): modify pcd metadata msg (#96)" #98