Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

build(deps): bump craft-archives #5124

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: hotfix/8.4
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

tigarmo
Copy link
Contributor

@tigarmo tigarmo commented Oct 16, 2024

This update fixes LP#2083013, where some package-repositories declarations could conflict with default sources present in Noble.

  • Have you followed the guidelines for contributing?
  • Have you signed the CLA?
  • Have you successfully run tox run -m lint?
  • Have you successfully run tox run -e test-py310? (supported versions: py39, py310, py311, py312)

@tigarmo tigarmo force-pushed the work/CRAFT-3538-noble-key-conflict branch from 56a1ed5 to c13c393 Compare October 16, 2024 20:54
@tigarmo tigarmo changed the base branch from main to hotfix/8.4 October 16, 2024 20:54
@tigarmo tigarmo closed this Oct 16, 2024
@tigarmo tigarmo reopened this Oct 16, 2024
@tigarmo tigarmo force-pushed the work/CRAFT-3538-noble-key-conflict branch 2 times, most recently from afebe09 to c136094 Compare October 17, 2024 13:55
This update fixes LP#2083013, where some package-repositories declarations
could conflict with default sources present in Noble and later.
@tigarmo tigarmo force-pushed the work/CRAFT-3538-noble-key-conflict branch from c136094 to 1c11c58 Compare October 17, 2024 15:52
@tigarmo tigarmo closed this Oct 17, 2024
@tigarmo tigarmo reopened this Oct 17, 2024
@tigarmo tigarmo requested review from mr-cal and lengau October 18, 2024 13:55
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ codespell==2.3.0
colorama==0.4.6
coverage==7.6.1
craft-application==4.2.7
craft-archives==2.0.0
craft-archives @ git+https://github.com/canonical/craft-archives@work/CRAFT-3538-noble-key-conflict
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just putting this here to make it easy if you take my suggestion about releasing today.

Suggested change
craft-archives @ git+https://github.com/canonical/craft-archives@work/CRAFT-3538-noble-key-conflict
craft-archives==2.0.1

@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ charset-normalizer==3.3.2
click==8.1.7
colorama==0.4.6
craft-application==4.2.7
craft-archives==2.0.0
craft-archives @ git+https://github.com/canonical/craft-archives@work/CRAFT-3538-noble-key-conflict
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just putting this here to make it easy if you take my suggestion about releasing today.

Suggested change
craft-archives @ git+https://github.com/canonical/craft-archives@work/CRAFT-3538-noble-key-conflict
craft-archives==2.0.1

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ chardet==5.2.0
charset-normalizer==3.3.2
click==8.1.7
craft-application==4.2.7
craft-archives==2.0.0
craft-archives @ git+https://github.com/canonical/craft-archives@work/CRAFT-3538-noble-key-conflict
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just putting this here to make it easy if you take my suggestion about releasing today.

Suggested change
craft-archives @ git+https://github.com/canonical/craft-archives@work/CRAFT-3538-noble-key-conflict
craft-archives==2.0.1

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ environment:
SNAP/test_multi_keys: test-multi-keys
SNAP/test_foreign_armhf: test-foreign-armhf
SNAP/test_foreign_i386: test-foreign-i386
SNAP/test_key_conflict: test-key-conflict
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is an excellent example of well-designed tests sight here.

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
name: test-key-conflict
version: '1.0'
summary: test package repos with keys already present on the system
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Like the well-designed tests above, this is a well-written example that makes it really clear. Thanks!

Copy link
Collaborator

@mr-cal mr-cal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approving with the assumption that @tigarmo will update the requirement files after releasing craft-archives.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants