Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(systemtests): update systemtests docs #23061

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

ChengenH
Copy link
Contributor

@ChengenH ChengenH commented Dec 22, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Corrected spelling errors in comments for clarity across multiple files.
    • Enhanced error handling in transaction validation to provide clearer responses.
  • Documentation

    • Improved clarity of comments in various methods to better describe their functionality.
  • New Features

    • Introduced a new collections value codec for protobuf messages, enhancing message handling capabilities.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 22, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request encompasses minor documentation and comment improvements across several files in the codebase. The changes primarily focus on correcting typographical errors, enhancing comment clarity, and making minor refinements to error handling and method documentation. The modifications span files related to ABCI implementation, codec handling, system testing, and consensus mechanisms, with no significant alterations to the underlying code functionality.

Changes

File Change Summary
baseapp/abci.go Corrected typo in PrepareProposal method comment.
codec/collections.go Updated comment about "collisions", added new protobuf message value codec methods, refined schema handling.
server/v2/cometbft/abci.go Improved error handling, refined consensus method implementations, updated method comments.
systemtests/system.go Enhanced method comments for clarity and specificity.

Suggested labels

backport/v0.52.x

Suggested reviewers

  • aaronc
  • kocubinski
  • facundomedica
  • testinginprod
  • sontrinh16
  • julienrbrt

Possibly related PRs


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e66b383 and dba92a3.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • baseapp/abci.go (1 hunks)
  • codec/collections.go (1 hunks)
  • server/v2/cometbft/abci.go (1 hunks)
  • systemtests/system.go (3 hunks)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added C:server/v2 Issues related to server/v2 C:server/v2 cometbft labels Dec 22, 2024
@ChengenH ChengenH closed this Dec 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
C:server/v2 cometbft C:server/v2 Issues related to server/v2
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant