-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 373
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(gnovm): Improve Error Message in evalStaticTypeOf
function
#2695
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from 1 commit
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -2449,16 +2449,33 @@ func evalStaticTypeOf(store Store, last BlockNode, x Expr) Type { | |
t := evalStaticTypeOfRaw(store, last, x) | ||
if tt, ok := t.(*tupleType); ok { | ||
if len(tt.Elts) != 1 { | ||
panic(fmt.Sprintf( | ||
"evalStaticTypeOf() only supports *CallExpr with 1 result, got %s", | ||
tt.String(), | ||
)) | ||
} else { | ||
return tt.Elts[0] | ||
loc := last.GetLocation() | ||
funcName := getFunctionName(x) | ||
valueCount := len(tt.Elts) | ||
|
||
var msg string | ||
if valueCount == 0 { | ||
msg = fmt.Sprintf("%s: %s() (no value) used as value", loc, funcName) | ||
} else { | ||
msg = fmt.Sprintf("%s: %s() (%d values) used as single value", loc, funcName, valueCount) | ||
} | ||
|
||
panic(fmt.Errorf("%s\nHint: Ensure the function returns a single value, or use multiple assignment", msg)) | ||
Comment on lines
+2458
to
+2463
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This hint may not be very effective if it corresponds to one of the messages above, such as: panic: main/func.gno:3:1: f() (no value) used as value I mean in this case, "or use multiple assignment" is superfluous。 There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Or not, this check should be checked somewhere other than There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. well I think this part feels odd to me(the original logic in if len(tt.Elts) != 1 {
panic(fmt.Sprintf(
"evalStaticTypeOf() only supports *CallExpr with 1 result, got %s",
tt.String(),
)) at the very least for case like: n := f2()
func f2() (string, int) {
return "hey", 0
} the check can happened in *AssignStmt, to identify a mismatch on LHS and RHS. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Writing so much just for the sake of discussion. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yes @ltzmaxwell I think this check should be done in AssignStmt and ValueDecl in trans_enter |
||
} | ||
return tt.Elts[0] | ||
} | ||
return t | ||
} | ||
|
||
// getFunctionName attempts to extract the function name from the expression | ||
func getFunctionName(x Expr) string { | ||
switch expr := x.(type) { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This is a nitpick, but it is a bit strange to have a switch with only one case |
||
case *CallExpr: | ||
if id, ok := expr.Func.(*NameExpr); ok { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. another name other than |
||
return string(id.Name) | ||
} | ||
} else { | ||
return t | ||
} | ||
return "<unknown function>" | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. should this happen? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This shouldn't happend. I added it just in case. |
||
} | ||
|
||
// like evalStaticTypeOf() but returns the raw *tupleType for *CallExpr. | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe the message could be improved here. "no value" doesn't seem as clear as saying something like "function does not return a value".