Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: create base eslint config #7057

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Oct 21, 2024
Merged

Conversation

araujogui
Copy link
Member

@araujogui araujogui commented Sep 23, 2024

Description

Create base ESLint config

Validation

Well, ESLint works

Related Issues

Related to #5405

Check List

  • I have read the Contributing Guidelines and made commit messages that follow the guideline.
  • I have run npm run format to ensure the code follows the style guide.
  • I have run npm run test to check if all tests are passing.
  • I have run npx turbo build to check if the website builds without errors.
  • I've covered new added functionality with unit tests if necessary.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 23, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Updated (UTC)
nodejs-org ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview Oct 21, 2024 10:10pm

apps/site/eslint.config.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
package.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
package.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@ovflowd ovflowd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Appreciate the effort here! But the base config should have nothing TypeScript related, afaik!

@araujogui araujogui marked this pull request as ready for review September 24, 2024 15:48
@araujogui araujogui requested a review from a team as a code owner September 24, 2024 15:48
@araujogui araujogui added the github_actions:pull-request Trigger Pull Request Checks label Sep 25, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the github_actions:pull-request Trigger Pull Request Checks label Sep 25, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 25, 2024

Lighthouse Results

URL Performance Accessibility Best Practices SEO Report
/en 🟢 100 🟢 100 🟢 100 🟢 91 🔗
/en/about 🟢 100 🟢 100 🟢 100 🟢 91 🔗
/en/about/previous-releases 🟢 99 🟢 100 🟢 100 🟢 92 🔗
/en/download 🟢 100 🟢 100 🟢 100 🟢 91 🔗
/en/blog 🟢 100 🟢 100 🟢 100 🟢 92 🔗

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 25, 2024

Unit Test Coverage Report

Lines Statements Branches Functions
Coverage: 92%
90.54% (594/656) 76.27% (180/236) 94.35% (117/124)

Unit Test Report

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
134 0 💤 0 ❌ 0 🔥 5.105s ⏱️

@bmuenzenmeyer
Copy link
Collaborator

@araujogui do you have time rebase this? sorry it's been getting stale

@araujogui
Copy link
Member Author

@nodejs/nodejs-website reviews pls

Copy link
Contributor

@AugustinMauroy AugustinMauroy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM !
As suggested in the turbo documentation, you can also use a package as a basis for the configuration
https://turbo.build/repo/docs/guides/tools/eslint#sharing-configuration

@araujogui araujogui added the github_actions:pull-request Trigger Pull Request Checks label Oct 21, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the github_actions:pull-request Trigger Pull Request Checks label Oct 21, 2024
@araujogui araujogui added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 21, 2024
Merged via the queue into nodejs:main with commit d6d445d Oct 21, 2024
15 checks passed
@araujogui araujogui deleted the chore/base-eslint branch October 21, 2024 22:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants