fix(ocrvs-5086): show different label when father address matches

[makelicious]

Show matching label depending on father's primary address selection.

• Extend conditionalCase type, allow passing Conditional[]

I could not get to a nicely working solution without utilising the Conditional type. I opted for not trying to modify the primaryAddress previewGroup since it was much more involved.

Let me know what you think. I left a todo comment which I intend to fix if you find the approach ok.

[makelicious]

@Zangetsu101 @rikukissa Just to clarify the discussion we had earlier:

1. Initial specification was to change the question labels
   Yes -> Same as mother's usual place of residence
No -> Different from mother’s usual place of residence
2. Tameem pointed out that we would need to create an exception for that
3. Another way would be to just use the "actual" label Same as mother's usual place of residence? instead of Usual place of residence

I could not find a simple way to change the label as suggested. Let me know if I missed something.

[Zangetsu101]

The changes look good! It's better this way than to handling the form label & review label separately. One other thing, although it's not mentioned in the ticket, in death form we also have a similar case for informant & spouse if I'm not wrong. They should have a field like "place of residence same as deceased". Let's add the conditionals for them as well please!

[rikukissa]

Was there some other mutation happening on a higher level that forced this function also to mutate the inner array values?

[makelicious]

I will check! I opted for caution if there was some performance reason for mutating.

[rikukissa]

If you see code with side effects in our codebase you can safely assume it's either:

1. Something higher in the call stack is built using mutation and the author didn't have time to fix the root issue
2. Side-effectful code got past code review unnoticed

We advocate for immutable values and anything else should be a rare exception

[makelicious]

Clear! On this particular case, We are mutating on higher levels. Taking into account the 1.5. delivery, I suggest I'll merge this one after the new changes have been reviewed and check whether I could get rid of the mutations.

[makelicious]

Added same conditionals for informant and spouse fields on 'Death' event

[Zangetsu101]

Looks good 👍