refactor: Exchange of the canonical function #336
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve updates to the YAML configuration for variant calls, specifically altering the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
workflow/resources/datavzrd/variant-calls-template.datavzrd.yaml(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
workflow/resources/datavzrd/variant-calls-template.datavzrd.yaml (2)
307-312: LGTM: Boolean visualization configuration looks good!
The spell configuration for boolean values is properly structured with appropriate true/false value mappings.
307-312: Verify documentation for the visualization change
The switch from heatmap to boolean spell visualization is a significant change that might affect users. Please ensure that:
- The documentation is updated to reflect this change
- A migration guide is provided if needed
- The change is mentioned in the changelog
Also applies to: 482-487
| spell: | ||
| url: v1.1.3/logic/boolean | ||
| with: | ||
| true_values: "true" | ||
| false_values: "false" | ||
| custom-content: ?empty_content |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix inconsistent configuration keys between coding and non-coding sections
The boolean spell configuration uses different key names in the coding and non-coding sections:
- Coding section:
true_value,false_value - Non-coding section:
true_values,false_values(plural)
This inconsistency could cause the non-coding section to fail. Both sections should use the same key names.
Apply this fix to maintain consistency:
spell:
url: v1.1.3/logic/boolean
with:
- true_values: "true"
- false_values: "false"
+ true_value: "true"
+ false_value: "false"📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| spell: | |
| url: v1.1.3/logic/boolean | |
| with: | |
| true_values: "true" | |
| false_values: "false" | |
| custom-content: ?empty_content | |
| spell: | |
| url: v1.1.3/logic/boolean | |
| with: | |
| true_value: "true" | |
| false_value: "false" | |
| custom-content: ?empty_content |
BenOrl
changed the title
BenOrl
changed the title
Boolean spell is used instead of a heatmap.
Summary by CodeRabbit
hgvspandhgvsccolumns to enhance data visualization with a new boolean logic representation.